Finite Difference Methods for Solving Linear and Nonlinear Ellipse Equations

Authors

  • Noor H. Abdullah University of AL-Hamdaniya
  • Shahab A.Hassan Al hamdaniya university

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54153/sjpas.2025.v7i1.992

Keywords:

: Finite Difference Method , linear and nonlinear ellipse equations , Square Grid , Standard Five Point Equation , Tyler's expansion.

Abstract

The study aims to determine the numerical solution of partial differential equations of the ellipse type, both linear and non-linear. One of the most popular methods for solving partial differential equations is the finite differences method, which provides accurate approximations in comparison to the actual solution of the problem. The study provided clarification by utilizing the Laplace equation's numerical and analytical solution as one example of a partial differential equation of the linear ellipse kind. Regarding the study of solving partial differential equations of the type of nonlinear ellipse that is difficult to solve theoretically, we were satisfied with finding the formula only and programming it to obtain the required results. We then used the MATLAB system to find the solution to these equations. The results showed that the numerical solution is superior to the analytical solution because it can solve complex problems numerically, which is what the analytical solution cannot master accurately.

References

1. Adu, P. (2020). Modified Iterative Method for Computing the Approximate Solutions of Nonlinear Equations University of Cape Coast].

2. Bashier, E. B. (2020). Practical Numerical and Scientific Computing with MATLAB® and Python. CRC Press.

3. Ferziger, J. H., & Perić, M. (2002). Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Springer.

4. Froese, B. D., & Oberman, A. M. (2011). Convergent finite difference solvers for viscosity solutions of the elliptic Monge–Ampère equation in dimensions two and higher. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 49(4), 1692-1714.

5. Iserles, A. (2009). A first course in the numerical analysis of differential equations. Cambridge university press.

6. Jovanović, B. S., & Süli, E. (2013). Analysis of finite difference schemes: for linear partial differential equations with generalized solutions (Vol. 46). Springer Science & Business Media.

7. Le Dret, H. (2018). Nonlinear elliptic partial differential equations. Springer.

8. LeVeque, R. J. (2007). Finite difference methods for ordinary and partial differential equations: steady-state and time-dependent problems. SIAM.

9. Mathews, J., & Fink Kurtis, D. (1999). Numerical Methods Using Matlab, Prenctice-Hall. Inc. New York.

10. Ray, S. S. (2018). Numerical analysis with algorithms and programming. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

11. Redheffer, R. M., & Port, D. (1992). Introduction to differential equations. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

12. S H, L. (2012). Numerical analysis of partial differential equations. John Wiley & Sons.

13. Shanthakumar, M. (1987). Computer Based Numerical Analysis. Khanna.

14. Simmons, G. F., & Krantz, S. G. (2007). Differential equations: theory, technique, and practice. McGraw-Hill New York.

15. Subramanian, V. R., & White, R. E. (2004). Semianalytical method of lines for solving elliptic partial differential equations. Chemical engineering science, 59(4), 781-788.

16. Zill, D. G., Cullen, M. R., & Wright, W. S. (1997). Differential equations with boundary-value problems. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-30

How to Cite

H. Abdullah, N., & A.Hassan, S. (2025). Finite Difference Methods for Solving Linear and Nonlinear Ellipse Equations. Samarra Journal of Pure and Applied Science, 7(1), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.54153/sjpas.2025.v7i1.992

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.